help button home button ClinMed NetPrints
HOME HELP FEEDBACK BROWSE ARTICLES BROWSE BY AUTHOR
Warning: This article has not yet been accepted for publication by a peer reviewed journal. It is presented here mainly for the benefit of fellow researchers. Casual readers should not act on its findings, and journalists should be wary of reporting them.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow HTML Page - table_1.htslp
Right arrow HTML Page - table_2.htslp
Right arrow HTML Page - tabla_3.htslp
Right arrow HTML Page - tabla_4.htslp
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this netprints
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Figar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Camera, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Figar, S.
Right arrow Articles by Camera, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Medicine:
Hypertension

Right arrow Gastroenterology:
Helicobacter Pylori

clinmed/2002120002v1 (February 13, 2003)
Contact author(s) for copyright information

Narrowing the gap in Hypertension: Efficacy of a Complex Antihypertensive Intervention Program in the Elderly – (CAIPE).

Silvana Figar, Gabriel Waisman, Fernan Gonzalez Bernaldo de Quiros, Carlos Galarza, Marcelo Marchetti, Gabriela Rodriguez Loria, Luis Camera, Daniel Seinhart, and Mario Camera

Objectives To assess the efficacy of a Complex Antihypertensive Intervention Programme in the Elderly. Design Quasi experimental programme trial. Setting Ambulatory care of a university-associated teaching hospital. Participants Hypertensive patients aged 65 years or over, 246 followed by clinicians were intervened and 212 followed by family physicians recieved usual care. A computer–based monitoring system was used for patient recruitment. Mean follow-up was 11 months. Intervention the programme included an organizational change with the addition of an office where patients had their blood pressure measured, were appointed to join educational sessions and received verbal and printed advice before medical attendance. Data was systematically recorded in the elecronic medical chart acting as a physician reminder during the visit. Main outcome measures Difference in systolic blood pressure level and in percentage of well-controlled (<140/90 mm Hg) patients between groups. Results The difference of mean change in systolic blood pressure between groups was 8.4 mm Hg (95% confidence interval 5 to 11 mm Hg). Percentage of well-controlled patients was 66% in intervention group and 47% in controls (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed an odds ratio of 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.54) for blood pressure above 140/90 mm Hg in patients who received the intervention, after adjusting for age, sex, initial systolic blood pressure level and changes in antihypertensive treatment. Conclusions These results support the efficacy of our complex intervention programme. Routine clinical care of hypertension can be improved with simple strategies that go beyond pharmacotherapy, tending to overcome clinical inertia.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK BROWSE ARTICLES BROWSE BY AUTHOR